STOP THE CASINO 101 COALITION

"I love the irony that Indians are making money off of white man's greed. They gave us alcohol that tore families apart, and we're giving them another addiction--gambling." 
Greg Sarris
, Chairman of the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria, The San Francisco Chronicle, May 15, 2000

CALL SEN. FEINSTEIN NOW! 415-393-0707 

"DIANNE'S CASINO":  MARIN COUNTY COUNSEL REVEALS FEINSTEIN BROKERED LATEST CASINO DEAL BETWEEN MARIN &, SONOMA COUNTIES & FIGR

(Note:  Feinstein's actions and the two county's agreements do not and cannot affect in any way the current lawsuit on the land to trust decision nor will they affect any environmental litigation.)

What's Senator Feinstein have against Sonoma County residents?  That's what Sonoma County residents are asking after learning that at the Tuesday (7/22/2008) meeting of the Marin County Board of Supervisors, Marin County Counsel Patrick Faulkner let slip that U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) brokered the latest deal with a North Bay casino tribe and the counties of Sonoma and Marin. 

This statement, caught on video and witnessed by STC101 spokesperson at the Marin meeting, Frank Egger, confirmed a comment by Sonoma County Counsel.  On  Monday,  Sonoma County Counsel told a Rohnert Park resident  that "one of the senators" would be "willing to carry a bill" to change the language of the Restoration Act of the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria (FIGR) so that all future trust acquisitions, but not the current casino site, would be subject to the Secretary of the Interior's discretion.

On Tuesday, both Sonoma and Marin supervisors approved agreements with the FIGR that were virtually identical in content, with only minimal notice to the public. 

This is the second deal that the Senator has brokered to further the building of an enormous casino just outside the City of Rohnert Park.  It was Senator Feinstein who, in 2003,  brokered the secret deal that allowed the FIGR to stay safe and sound at the Rohnert Park site. 

At that time, the Senator's husband, Richard Blum, owned a controlling interest in Perini Corp., a construction firm that has done billions of dollars of work for the casino industry, including the building of Thunder Valley Casino, a tribal casino near Sacramento built and managed by the FIGR's partner, Station Casinos Inc. of Las Vegas, which opened in 2003.  In 2007, Senator Feinstein resigned from the Senate Military Affairs Construction subcommittee after a series of articles exposed her relationship with Perini Corp, which had received $759 million in military contracts. 

The Senator's 2003 deal with Greg Sarris, Chairman of the FIGR, was that if the FIGR moved its casino site from the original Highway 37 site near the Marin/Sonoma border, she would not obstruct the acquisition of any future site, a promise she apparently continues to keep. 

When STC101 Founder Pastor Chip Worthington went to Washington in 2003, he told Joel McFadden at a meeting in the Senator's office, that he knew about the deal. 

McFadden was visibly shaken, and literally begged Pastor Worthington not to go public with the information. Pastor Worthington,  politically naïve at that point in time, out of courtesy to the Senator,  agreed not to go public. 

It is now apparent that Sen. Feinstein has always been the key to the Rohnert Park casino debacle.  The Senator's strategy appears to be, the further north the casinos go, the better it is for the wealthy residents of Marin County and for the Senator's home town, San Francisco. 

Last year, the Senator cut a deal with Lytton Band of Pomo Indians that prevented the tribe from opening a 2,500 slot machine casino in San Pablo.  The Senator commented at the time that her legislation "...ensure(d) that a major Nevada-style casino will not be built in the Bay Area in the near future."

But her deal with the Lytton Band of Pomo Indians (San Pablo casino) has had the effect of driving the Lyttons back up Sonoma County in Windsor, where reliable sources inside Town Hall say that the Lytton have indicated that they may indeed go for the Class III casino they were denied in San Pablo,  on 60+ acres of Windsor land they plan to put into trust.   

"Make no mistake, this is a class struggle", said Pastor Worthington.  "Marin County is the acknowledged cash cow for the Democratic Party in California.  One the other hand, us Sonoma County folks are the rubes and the hayseeds.  The Senator's behavior is reprehensible, sneaky, self-serving and conniving." 

For the past five years, Senator Feinstein's office has received innumerable requests from Sonoma County residents to amend the Graton Rancheria Restoration Act,  as she had done for the Highway 37 site.  This most likely would have prevented the construction of a casino on the Rohnert Park site. 

Now Senator Feinstein is ready to amend the Graton Restoration Act, but only for future land acquisitions so that Marin County will be protected from a casino; The Rohnert Park site will not be affected.

"This is the grossest betrayal of trust, and a terrible blow to all of the Senator's loyal supporters here in Sonoma County, many of whom have continued to hope that she would help them with  this problem", said Pastor Worthington. 

"We face serious environmental and social impacts from Dianne's Casino that all the money in the world cannot solve", he said.  "For the Senator to put the selfish interests of herself and elite Marin County residents and the casino developers over the grave concerns of her Sonoma County constituents is unforgiveable"

"Dianne's Casino has been the result of one backroom deal after another, and the people of Sonoma County are tired of being ignored and lied to by their elected officials."

Satellite View of Casino Site (in Green)
sitemap07.jpg
Click on Pic for More Satellite Images

This site  The Web 

Sonoma Sunshine
SSunshine.4.72.jpg
Photo by Grace Emery

CLICK PIC TO JOIN!
diversity.jpg

Opposition to the Graton casino is increasing daily. Every day, more people sign up on our web site, and every day, a new group steps forward.  Among those who have joined our efforts and have voiced their opposition are homeowner organizations,  medical professionals, teachers of all grade levels, high school students, college professors and college students, people of all political persuasions from Conservatives to Progressives to Greens and everything in between, Labor, elected officials from both sides of the aisle, LGBTand straight, people of every conceivable religious persuasion and every ethnic group.   Opposition to the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria casino is truly a cross-section of Sonoma County.  JOIN US NOW! 

CLICK ON PIC for GREEN INFO
Salamander_painting.jpg
Artwork by Molly Eckler www.mollyeckler.com

READ THE FACTS BEHIND THE GRATON RANCHERIA!  Discover the history of the Graton Rancheria and review actual historical documents dating back almost 100 years! 

Large Vernal Pool on Casino Site
VernalPoolonCasinosSite.jpg

Who We Are...

STOP THE CASINO 101 COALITION (STC101) is a non-sectarian, multi-cultural group founded in in August, 2003, by long-time Rohnert Park resident Chip Worthington and hundreds (now thousands) of concerned Sonoma County citizens,  in response to plans by the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria to build a massive, 760,000 square foot Las Vegas-style urban casino on the outskirts of town, in one of the most environmentally-sensitive areas possible - what is arguably one of the last, large continuous pieces of vernal wetlands in Sonoma County.

The proposed casino would be located midway between the two largest urbanized areas in Sonoma County: Santa Rosa and Petaluma. The sensitive vernal wetlands habitat which forms the headwaters of the Laguna de Santa Rosa, a rare vernal lake, and includes 180 acres of Community Separator which pass out of the control of Sonoma County residents if the land is placed into trust for the tribe.   A large sewage treatment plant is planned for this Community Separator land, one that would be adjacent to over 300 homes.

The newly-configured "Wilfred Site" is zoned Rural Residential and Agricultural, not Commercial, as FIGR Chairman Greg Sarris claims. In fact, within several dozen yards of the site, there are over 600 residential units, and another approximately 500 only a few blocks away, with thousands in the town of Rohnert Park.. 

Federal policy allows Indian casinos to ignore all local zoning and planning. These neighborhood casinos are outside the jurisdiction of state and local government and law enforcement. They create "islands of non-jurisdiction", making it virtually impossible for communities to address the changes - and problems - casinos create.

Although it once seemed that there was little a town could do to protect itself from these huge casinos, the tide has begun to turn and now, everyday people, along with local, state and federal officials, are taking a stand to stop the spread of Las Vegas gambling into their hometowns. In city after city and county after county, people are standing up to demand an end to urban casinos.

STC101, working in conjunction with other pro-community groups in the area, has successfully mounted a vigorous campaign of protest and public education. STC101 has been able to expand its efforts to the regional, state and national level, and we will continue our efforts to stop the construction of a "monster casino" on the outskirts of Rohnert Park.


We're in it for the long run.

New Casino Site Looking North from Labath Avenue
newcasinositejpeg.jpg
Non-Stop Casino Traffic? Click on Photo for More Info

Casino Site
casinositenice.jpg

Vernal Pool
vernalpool1.jpg
Click Pic for Green Info

Sonoma Mountain
sonomamountain.jpg
CLICK ON PICTURE FOR COMMUNITY CONCERNS

Stop the Casino 101 Coalition, Rohnert Park, CA

FAIR USE NOTICE
  
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.